A year ago, the average recruitment agency was paying for 5-8 separate tools. Most of them are now either redundant or being replaced by AI-native alternatives. Here's what's actually changed.

The typical agency was spending thousands per month across tools that didn't talk to each other. Here's what those numbers look like:

5-8
Separate tools in 2025
60%
Spend now redundant
0
Tools that talk to each other

How has the stack changed?

Here's a side-by-side comparison of what agencies were using 12 months ago versus what the sharpest ones are running now:

Function 2025 2026
Sourcing LinkedIn Recruiter Lite + Boolean AI search + your own database
Enrichment Lusha / ContactOut (per-seat) Multi-provider enrichment (pay per use)
Outreach Lemlist OR Instantly (separate tool) Integrated outreach from your database
CRM Bullhorn / JobAdder / Vincere Same — but synced, not manual entry
Research Google + LinkedIn + guesswork AI company research in seconds
Market mapping Manual spreadsheets Automated org mapping from LinkedIn
Follow-ups Calendar reminders + memory Agent-driven, auto-triggered

If you're still using Boolean for sourcing, read about why Boolean strings are dead and what replaced them.

What are you probably still paying for (and shouldn't be)?

These are the three biggest areas of wasted spend we see across agencies. Expand each to see if it applies to you:

LinkedIn Recruiter full seats

▼

If you're paying per seat for Recruiter, check whether your usage actually justifies the cost. Many agencies have 10 seats and 3 people who actually use it regularly. AI search on your own database reduces LinkedIn dependency significantly.

This doesn't mean cancelling LinkedIn entirely. It means being honest about how many full-price seats you actually need.

Per-seat enrichment tools

▼

Lusha, ContactOut, ZoomInfo — these are brilliant tools, but the per-seat model means you're paying even when people don't use them. Pay-per-use enrichment (where you only pay for the credits you actually consume) is almost always cheaper.

One API key serving the whole team costs a fraction of 10 individual subscriptions.

Standalone outreach tools

▼

If your outreach tool doesn't connect to your database, you're double-handling data. Every time you export a CSV from your CRM to upload into Lemlist, that's time and data you're losing.

Integrated outreach — where candidates go straight from your database into a campaign — eliminates this entire step.

The trend: Recruitment tech is consolidating. Instead of 8 tools that don't talk to each other, agencies are moving to platforms where everything connects to one database they own.

Here's the before and after of what a typical agency's monthly tech spend looks like:

2025 Stack

  • LinkedIn Recruiter x5 seats
  • Lusha Team plan x5
  • Lemlist Pro x3
  • Bullhorn per-seat
  • Manual research (time cost)
  • Spreadsheets for mapping
  • Calendar reminders for follow-ups

2026 Stack

  • AI search on your own database
  • Pay-per-use enrichment (one key)
  • Integrated outreach from database
  • Bullhorn (synced by agents)
  • AI company research (seconds)
  • Automated org mapping
  • Agent-driven follow-ups

What hasn't changed (and won't)?

  • You still need a CRM. Bullhorn, JobAdder, CATS — the CRM isn't going anywhere. But how you put data into it is changing (agents do it, not you).
  • LinkedIn is still the source. The data comes from LinkedIn. The difference is whether you're manually browsing it or whether an agent is systematically mining it for you.
  • Relationships still close deals. No amount of AI replaces a good recruiter on the phone. The tech just gets you to that conversation faster.

How should you audit your current stack?

For each tool you're currently paying for, work through this checklist. Be honest — the goal isn't to rip everything out overnight, but to understand where money is being wasted:

How many people actually use this tool regularly? (Not "have access" — actually use it.)
Can an AI-native alternative do this cheaper or better?
Does this tool connect to my other tools, or is it an island?
Am I paying per seat when I should be paying per use?
If I cancelled this tomorrow, would I lose data I can't get back?

That last question is the most important one. If you'd lose data, read about why owning your data matters and how to start.

Common Questions

Do recruitment agencies still need LinkedIn Recruiter seats?

▼

Not as many as they think. Many agencies have 10 seats but only 3 people who use them regularly. AI search on your own database reduces LinkedIn dependency significantly. Check whether your per-seat cost is justified by actual usage.

What recruitment tools are being replaced by AI?

▼

Per-seat sourcing tools, standalone enrichment subscriptions, separate outreach platforms, manual research processes, and spreadsheet-based market mapping are all being replaced or consolidated by AI-native alternatives that connect to a single database.

Should agencies replace their CRM with AI tools?

▼

No. The CRM isn't going anywhere. What's changing is how data gets into it — agents handle the entry instead of recruiters. The CRM remains the system of record, but AI eliminates the manual data entry around it.

Bottom line: The best tech stack in 2026 isn't more tools. It's fewer tools that actually work together, with AI handling the manual work in between.